Showing posts with label KM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label KM. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Web 2.0 and the empowerment of the knowledge worker

Ashwini, Dick Eleanor, Holger, Kai (MIM-SUMMER GROUP)


Web 2.0 and the empowerment of the knowledge worker
Dirk Schneckenberg is an Assistant Professor at ESC Rennes School of Business, Rennes, France
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1367-3270. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, VOL. 13 NO. 6 2009, pp. 509-520


Review
The article is easy to read and understand. It highlights to the reader the importance of Web 2.0 and it’s relevance in today’s business environment. The author also cautioned that to achieve optimal benefits of incorporating Web 2.0 into an organisation. It will be most important to change organisational structure to allow employees to have more freedom to make their own decisions.
He did not explore in more detail on the various relationships between pervasive technologies and structural changes of companies in modern business. But he emphasized that the unpredictable and technology-intensive markets forced a rethink of key principles of management theory for corporate governance, knowledge management and employee motivation.

There was no discussion on the acceptance of Web 2.0 by older employees – “digital migrants”. This group is not so comfortable with Web 2.0 as “digital native” and the introduction of Web 2.0 and its portfolio of tools will further alienate these groups and will not go down well for the corporate culture and exchange of knowledge as the Author proposed.


Paper type: Conceptual paper, suitable for academics, Managers


Summary
The author highlighted the potential use of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge management and to look at how corporate governance models influence the adoption of Web 2.0 for organisational learning and knowledge exchange.

A survey done by McKinsey indicated that 75% of the companies surveyed have invested in Web 2.0 tools. Most respondents agreed that Web 2.0 tools, in particular Wikis, Blogs, and Real Simple Syndication (RSS) feeds enhanced social networking behaviour , improved communication with their customers and suppliers on core business processes like product design and development; and they encouraged collaboration and knowledge exchange between employees

The author also discusses how corporate structures and decision-making roles influence the usage of Web 2.0 to enhance group interaction, organisational learning and the empowerment of employees. The pyramid structure represents a hierarchical culture, in which leadership makes centralised decisions at the top of the organisation and the pancake a non-hierarchical, flat culture, in which employees have a high degree of autonomy to make decisions based on their own knowledge without having to necessarily get prior approval from the organisational leadership.
It will be interesting to see if a company like Google, which was born in the Web 2.0 era and which clearly favours the empowerment of its employees, will in the long run transform to a corporate pyramid.

Today’s young and technology-savvy knowledge workers, which have grown up as members of the ‘digital native’ generation, increasingly ask corporate leaders to integrate Web 2.0 tools in the enterprise platform for future organisational learning; they want to interact and collaborate in their workplace environments in the same way they interact and collaborate in their peer communities in the web. To be able to do this, knowledge workers need firstly, a decentralised corporate culture which grants them the competence and autonomy to define as peers in workgroups, their own work processes and make their own decisions in business.

Web 2.0 is rapidly gaining attention in the discussion about the impact of internet technologies on current society and business. It is easy to use and intuitive, has a high adoption rate. It provides the basis for a more mature Internet usage, in which users collaborate, share information and create network and scale effects in large communities.

The author cautioned and provided a few pointers when introducing Web 2.0 to the company - Chief information officers (CIO’s) and human resources (HR) managers, who plan to introduce Web 2.0 tools into their corporate environment, need to be realistic about the definition of objectives for the use of Web 2.0 technologies in corporate contexts. Their corporate leadership has first of all to understand the impact which fundamental configurations of the corporate culture have on implementation of Web 2.0 technologies.

A corporate environment, which encourages autonomous and self-responsible employee decisions, will drive an adoption of Web 2.0 tools for knowledge exchange and organisational learning. To convince them of the benefits of the Web 2.0-enhanced way of business, corporate leaders have to see examples of modern companies, which have profited from lateral structures and decentralized decision-making in modern markets. Once the Web 2.0-based enterprise platform has been implemented, essential corporate information has to be distributed through it to make tools like Wikis, Blogs and RSS feeds relevant to employees and to trigger the development of a new communication culture within the organisation.

The high adoption rate of Web 2.0 technologies in companies indicates that this innovation process is a managerial challenge most corporate leaders have to face in the near future. They need to think about the potential of Web 2.0 technologies to trigger a fresh approach to organisational learning, to re-engineer internal knowledge management, and to enhance external customer services. If corporate leaders fail to do so now, their companies run the risk of falling behind the fast-moving frontline of technology adoption, which will in the long run weaken their competitive advantage in volatile and knowledge-intense markets.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Article Name: A Framework of Knowledge Management Systems: Issues & Challenges for Theory and Practice.
Author: Jungpil Hahn, Mani R. Subramani
Publication: Knowledge Management Systems 
Keywords: Information in organizations, knowledge management, knowledge management systems, organizational behaviour, organizational learning.

Summary: (259 Words)
Knowledge management concepts and practices in organizations are increasingly becoming important and firms are making momentous IT investments in deploying knowledge management systems (KMS). Knowledge management is the systemic and organizationally specified process for acquiring, organizing, and communicating knowledge of employees so that other employees may make use of it to be more effective and productive in their work.

This paper supplies an in depth research on knowledge management systems by proposing a developed framework called “Locus of Knowledge”. This framework is comprised of:
- Document Repository (Data Warehousing)
- Yellow Pages of Experts (Expertise Profiles and Databases)
- Collaborative Filtering (Internets and Search Engines)
- Electronic Discussion Forum

This framework provides a means to explore issues related to KMS and unifying dimensions underlying different types of KMS. As the basis of value creation increasingly depends on the influence of the intangible assets of firms, knowledge management systems (KMS) are emerging as powerful sources of competitive advantage. However, the general recognition of the importance of such systems seems to be accompanied by a technology-induced drive to implement systems with inadequate consideration of the fundamental knowledge problems that the KMS are likely to solve.

The possibilities that authors have discussed and raised within this paper is all about the size and diversity of networks, the maintenance of knowledge flows, and the long term effects of the use of KMS. This will facilitate a framework for the organizations as a reference that would enhance the usability of Knowledge Management System to its fullest and will also open avenues for future perspectives.

Review: (105 Words)
This article is one of unique writings from other articles. It portrays a sense of formal knowledge management framework and its methodology. One of the beauties about this article is that it explored positive, neutral and negative views of the topic and provided with clear evidences and investigations of each author.

One of the few weaknesses of the articles is that it’s not targeting one particular audience and keeping the views quite general. Conclusion is well built but leaves me with few questions to explore and search, which is on the other hand, is productive for audience. Overall it’s a nice article and worth reading.

(Posted by Jocelyn for Afraz) 

Monday, November 30, 2009

Factors Affecting the Adoption of Knowledge Management Technologies: A Discriminative Approach

ARTICLE SUMMARY & REVIEW (Week3-Class4) by Fatemeh Hosseini

(Group: KMx6- Fatemeh, Skalk, Bee, Lanoi, Max, Roger)

Article: Factors Affecting the Adoption of Knowledge Management Technologies: A Discriminative Approach

Please find the review for this article here.

Knowledge management systems: finding a way with technology

ARTICLE SUMMARY & REVIEW (Week3-Class4) by Fatemeh Hosseini

(Group: KMx6- Fatemeh, Skalk, Bee, Lanoi, Max, Roger)

Article: John S. Edwards, Duncan Shaw & Paul M. Collier (2005). Knowledge management systems: finding a way with technology. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 9 (1), 113-125.

Please find the review here.

The Tools & Technologies Needed for Knowledge Management

ARTICLE SUMMARY & REVIEW (Week3-Class4)
(By MIM-SUMMER: Ashwini, Dick, Eleanor, Kai, Holger)

Title: The Tools and Technologies Needed for Knowledge Management (KM)

Theme: This article aims to provide an overview of KM software market, broadly Consisting of two categories: KM infra-structure tools and technologies and KM access software.

SUMMARY

The author, referring to different definitions of knowledge management, recognizes the enormous value that human resources bring to an organization. She suggests that effective leveraging of knowledge, enabled by appropriate technology infra-structure providing the base for establishment of KM solutions, leads to organization environments where knowledge sharing and collaboration becomes a ‘BAU’. KM infra-structure tools and KM access software are the two major categories of KM software market.

KM Infra-structure Tools and Technologies

Data Warehousing Infra-structure: These include tools and application software that focus on extraction and analysis of data captured from business applications to support business decision-making.

Content Retrieval/Management software: These tools, supporting un-structured data management requirements of KM initiatives, enable users to organize information at the object level based on topical areas rather than full documents.

Business-ware Management Systems (BWMS): They enable knowledge capture & use by providing support for real-time application integration and business process automation.

Collaborative Applications: They focus on core functions like email, shared folders/databases, group calendaring/scheduling, and custom applications for knowledge sharing and collaboration.

KM Access Software

Enterprise Information Portals (EIP): This software, augmented by KM tools, provides individual/group access to both structured and un-structured data.

Intellectual capital Management (ICM) Software: It builds and manages the employee competencies inventory, monitors and manages processes by transferring know-how into corporate policies and procedures.

Workforce/Skills management Applications: They determine location of corporate expertise, help in hiring/deploying/retaining employees for supporting KM initiatives.

Emerging KM Tools & Technologies

The new emerging technologies include ‘knowledge exchange platforms’ for trading in knowledge, corporate learning management software, knowledge workflow management software, and knowledge profiling technologies.

REVIEW

The article provides a bird’s eye view of the various tools and technologies available in the KM software market. The simple language, good writing style, logical flow of subject matter has served the intended purpose of introducing the reader to the tools and technologies needed in KM. However, the importance of adoption of these technologies by the ‘people’ component of a KM system has been totally ignored and there is a scope for improving the structure of subject matter.

Reference:
Duffy, J. (2001). The Tools and Technologies Needed for Knowledge Management, Information Management Journal, 35 (1), pp 64.

Monday, November 23, 2009

The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management

Read a summary and review of the article "The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management" by Liam Fahey and Laurence Prusak here.

The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice

Read a summary and review of Rudy Ruggles's article "The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice" here.

What is Knowledge Management (KM)?

MIM – KM Enlightenment Group – Clement, Des, Madalin, Satish, Raju, Teri
Lecture 2: Week 2 Reading Summary and Review
What is Knowledge Management (KM)? - University of Berkeley's "Gotcha"


Summary

This article outlines and sets out the framework of some key characteristics of KM and it’s strategic implementation. In defining Knowledge Management one needs to consider some key typical questions such as;
1.What is KM?
2.Why is it important?
3.How is it different from other fields?
4.What is the KM process?

Knowledge Management (KM) embraces a model wherein knowledge is micro-managed; analysed, assessed and evaluated in its various components, ascertaining its impact in promoting learning and innovation. Some of its core components include, knowledge –
generation;
accessing from external sources;
embedding it in various processes;
representing knowledge in various media
facilitating its growth;
transference within organization;
measuring and assessing its impact.

KM has its own circular process, facilitating operators to access it at any point and traverse it whenever required. The process is categorized, allowing decision-making and identifying the knowledge domain. The categories include generation, accumulation, evaluation, improvement, sharing, protection and utilization.

To have a competitive edge, knowledge is an invaluable commodity for any organisation and therefore, techniques that enhance its growth and systematic distribution are vital ingredients for success. Indeed, KM is inherent in most organisations but in KM knowledge is dynamically and systematically embedded in networks, processes and operators, enabling enhancement and maintaining competitive advantage.

Review
The article was written in 1999. By 2009 the global expansion of the Internet has had a dramatic effect on KM. Ironically, some knowledge on the Internet can age rapidly. Numerous links on the article no longer reference their original sources. Knowledge coherence has been lost. Is the Internet an effective Knowledge Manager?

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Knowledge Management: Definitions and Solutions

Week 2, Class 2 Article Summary & Review
(by MIM-SUMMER Group: Ashwini, Dick, Eleanor, Holger & Kai)

Title: Knowledge Management – Definitions and Solutions

Audience: Students/Academia of Knowledge Management (KM) Studies, Knowledge Project Managers, Management Consultants, Business Managers and CEOs.

Theme: This article focuses on providing an overview of the ‘Knowledge Management’ concepts and practical starter tips to those who are promoting or implementing a KM project in a business organization.

Summary: (220 words)

At the outset, this article describes KM as a process for generating value from the intellectual and knowledge based assets in an organization, leading to a win-win situation for all concerned. Explicit assets are those which can be documented e.g. business plans, customer lists and system manuals, whereas hard to manage tacit assets like technical know-how & company culture are embedded in the minds of people. Shadowing and Joint-problem-solving are two best practices to transfer tacit-knowledge.

KM in an organization can improve efficiency, enhance productivity and increase revenues through contextual sharing / collaboration of knowledge, improved customer service, streamlined operations and cost reductions.

Major challenges include: a) getting employees on board, b) ongoing maintenance of knowledge assets, and c) filtering of information overload.

It is wiser to sell the KM project to its sponsor on the basis of measurable value for individuals instead of enterprise-wide dollar ROI value. Starting small on a pilot basis involving opinion-leaders and the people who are to gain maximum, integrating KM with every-day job performance without increasing workload, clearly defining values to be achieved, establishing metrics to measure success, making a sound business case, are the important components of a KM strategy. ‘Social Network Analysis’ can help in identifying the key knowledge experts and provide a starting point for the KM initiatives in an organization.

Review: (51 words)

The strength of this article lies in its simple, easy to understand business language and the structured, best-practice way to explain the basic KM concepts / tools and salient components of the entire spectrum of a KM program in any organization without using any technical or management jargon or abstract terminology.

Reference:

Levinson, M. (2007). Knowledge Management: Definitions and Solutions, CIO. Retrieved November 21, 2009 from http://www.cio.com/article/40343

The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management

MIM-SUMMER -- Ashwini, Dick Eleanor, Holger, Kai

MMIM503 – Week 2 - Class 3 (Article Summary & Review)

The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management
Liam Fahey, Laurence Prusak. California Management Review. Berkeley: Spring 1998. Vol. 40, Iss. 3; pg. 265, 12 pgs


Review
The article highlights to the reader eleven errors (pit-falls) that can be avoided by having a proper understanding of knowledge itself and their key implications in an organisation settings. The significance of understanding these errors is that knowledge management does not become another management craze or even worse managing knowledge based upon faulty principles.

Summary
The focus is on fundamental errors, if left uncorrected will impede genuine knowledge from being developed and leveraged.
Error I: Not Developing a Working Definition of Knowledge
Error 2: Emphasizing Knowledge Stock to the Detriment of Knowledge Flow
Error 3: Viewing Knowledge as Existing Predominantly Outside the Heads of Individuals
Error 4: Not Understanding that a Fundamental Intermediate Purpose of Managing Knowledge Is to Create Shared Context
Error 5: Paying Little Heed to the Role and Importance of Tacit Knowledge
Error 6: Disentangling Knowledge from Its Uses
Error 7: Downplaying Thinking and Reasoning
Error 8: Focusing on the Past and the Present and Not the Future
Error 9: Failing to Recognize the Importance of Experimentation
Error 10: Substituting Technological Contact for Human Interface
Error 11: Seeking to Develop Direct Measures of Knowledge

What can be done?

Identifying and correcting these errors is important. There are three critical sets of actions that managers can take to avoid these errors and move their organization toward becoming a more knowledge-driven enterprise.
1) Reflect on knowledge as an organizational asset. Develop shared understanding at local levels; since knowledge tends to be a "local" phenomenon and only later do it at the enterprise level.
2) Understand the flow perspective of knowledge: substantial portions of knowledge content are always tentative, temporary, and subject to change. Reframe from the inevitable focus of a data- or information-dominated (stock) view of knowledge.
3) Must be vigilant about detecting and correcting errors in their processes of generating, moving, and leveraging of knowledge throughout the firm.